Tuesday, July 08, 2014

Indian English

We Indians have a unique way to speaking English. Since English is not our 1st (or sometimes even 2nd) language, we tend to translate sentences from our native language word by word, and do not follow the right usage and grammatical structures. Here are some some examples I have noticed over the years.

English sentence - I came last night.
Indian thinking in Hindi - मैं  कल रात आया ।
Indian speaking in Indian English - I came yesterday night.

English sentence- The food tastes good.
Indian thinking in Hindi - खाने का स्वाद अच्छा है ।
Indian speaking in Indian English - The taste of the food is nice.

English sentence - I have a story.
Indian thinking in Hindi - मेरे पास एक कहानी है ।
Indian speaking in Indian English - I have one story.

English - Can I do this?
Indian thinking in Hindi - मैं यह कर सकता हूँ ना ?
Indian speaking in Indian English - I can do this, right?

English - We need another day.
Indian thinking in Hindi - हमें एक और दिन चाहिये ।
Indian speaking in Indian English - I need one more day.


Tuesday, November 26, 2013

The ultimate Sachin Tendulkar interview

When you hear interviews of most team mates of Sachin Tendulkar, they, apart from praising his humble nature and hardwork, also mention that he has a keen understanding of the game. However, this aspect is never explored by interviewers when they interview Sachin. All they ask him about are run-of-the-mill questions about his love for the game, his response to the praise he receives from people etc. I am waiting for the day when a good cricket analyst gets to interview him and asks some truly cricketing questions, that would give an insight into how his cricketing mind worked.

Here are some questions I would like to ask him -

1. Over his long career, there were a few instances where he got distracted by the sight screen not being in position or someone walking past the sight screen, and got out soon. This seemed to happen more to him than other batsmen. Did such distractions during an inning break his concentration to a great extent?


2. Sachin has been dismissed by debutants a number of times in test cricket. He has also stated in the past that he sometimes does not like facing part time bowlers. There was an instance in South Africa, where he asked Dravid to take strike against the bowling of Cronje and he would face Donald, as he was not reading Cronje well. What is the reason behind his dismissals to debutants and part timers? Is it because he has not had a chance to analyse their bowling before hand?


3. The concept of benefit of doubt to the batsman has gone out of the game in case of LBWs since the DRS has been introduced. Umpires are more inclined to give line calls out than before. And even if they give the line calls not out, many of them are overturned after replays. We know that BCCI's opposition to DRS started after the 2008 Indian tour to Sri Lanka, when Ajanta Mendis got most of our top batsman out LBW through DRS. Do you think Indian top order of the time was worried about getting LBW more often due to DRS, and this was the main reason for their opposition to it?

4. We have never seen Sachin get angry after a bad umpiring decision. However, we have noticed that he sometimes take deep breaths on his way back to the pavilion after a bad decision. Is that his way of calming himself? When did he feel most agitated by a bad decision and how did he deal with it?
   

Type-casting

I had predicted that something like this might happen in my blog post 6.5 years ago, :-)

Tuesday, November 12, 2013

Why Do We Love Sachin Tendulkar?

More words are being written about Sachin Tendulkar's retirement than perhaps any other cricketer in history. As most cricket fans know all his batting feats at the top of their minds anyway, many eulogies are focussing on the impact he has had on India outside of the numbers he has racked up on the field. Here is my take on why India loves him so much.

Cricketing heroes have always had superstar status in India, rivaling most top Bollywood celebrities. Sunil Gavaskar and Kapil Dev had demi-god status during their heyday. MS Dhoni and Virat Kohli are the new age super celebs. This begs the question, how (and more importantly why) has India's love for Sachin been different than any other cricketer. While his great feats on the field, his longevity in the game and his gentlemanly nature are major contributors, there are some other more subtle aspects to Sachin that, I feel, are also a part of the reason why Indians love him like no other.

Throughout it's history, the Indian cricket team's strength had always been it's batting. While we always had good batsmen who made loads of runs periodically, the lineup was mostly brittle and crumbled under pressure against good bowling attacks and overseas. When Sachin took international cricket by storm in the early 90's, he became India's most consistent batsman after Gavaskar. And while Gavaskar had mostly helped India draw Test matches with his big hundreds, Sachin was helping India win ODI games (and occasionally Test matches as well). Throughout the 90's, Sachin used to be India's sole hope of winning tough games against good teams. Sachin gone, game gone. Heartbeats across the nation used to rise when Sachin came into bat. Everyone knew that one false shot from his bat will result in India's loss. Every Indian fan who followed Indian cricket in the 90's is witness to the extreme nervousness that used to run through their veins when Sachin came out to bat. It was as if the whole nation was batting with him. The whole nation rejoiced when he hit a four or six as if every one of us hit it. And all of us lost hope when he got out. We have had many great batsman in India after 2000, who have single handedly won India countless games. But in all their cases, we knew that they were not our only hope. If Sehwag got out, Yuvraj would come in. If Kohli got out, Dhoni would come in. But in the 90's, Sachin was India and India was Sachin. This connected Indian fans emotionally to his batting like never before.

Perhaps another subtle reason was his personality and demeanor. Tendulkar has always looked younger than his age. When he started at the age of 16, he looked like a 12 year old. His boyish charm endeared him to women and elderly people who may not have followed his cricketing exploits closely. Everyone in India felt like he is a kid from their extended family. Even today, he looks much younger than 40. And to top it all off, his personality is quintessentially Indian. He is a mild mannered person in every sense (not as aggressive as Ganguly, abrasive as Kohli, articulate as Dravid, astute as Dhoni - everything apart from his batting is mild), trying to stay clear of any controversy (sometimes even at the expense of not taking a stand on issues that matter like match fixing, DRS, IPL fiascos etc.), with limited leadership qualities (with limited success as Captain of India and Mumbai Indians). Perhaps all these traits that are common to most Indians make us feel that he is one of us, and not someone different.

While we all know that Sachin is as special as it gets in terms of cricketing ability, we feel he is one of us as a person. He is like someone from our family who has made it big. We feel he belongs to us, like no other public figure. That's why we love him so much.       

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

Nothing Strategic About It

The IPL has brought in a lot of novelty into Cricket. While some of them have added value to the game and the telecast of it, like Spidercam, stats seemingly appearing on the surface of the ground, innovative stokes like the scoop and reverse scoop; others, like Cheerleaders, the Mongoose bat etc. mostly been rejected as gimmicks. 

One new idea implemented in the IPL has been the concept of a "Strategic Time-out". The idea of a timeout is borrowed from NBA and NFL, where coaches of both sides have the option for calling for a fixed number of timeouts during the game. Reason being - The strategy in these sports is run by the coach (like soccer). There is no concept of an on field captain managing things on the field. Also, these sports are played very fast with no time to stop, discuss among players and coach and re-strategize (like time between balls and overs in Cricket). Hence, a timeout helps the team and coach to get together and plan the next step. In high octane games  like NBA, it also allows the players to catch a breather and start with full energy again. Otherwise they would loose steam after a while and the game would become slow and boring. And the icing on the cake is that it allows some ads to be put in between the game. There has been a case for having timeouts / smaller playing intervals in other sports like soccer and hockey for similar reasons. The Indian Hockey League (started a few years back with a model similar to IPL) has 4 quarters instead of 2 halves, for similar reasons.

However, none of the above apply to cricket. In cricket, the real time strategy is done by the captain on the field. He has enough time to speak to players after each over (and even between balls if required). Plus there are drinks breaks when teams can get together for discussions. The timeout has been added in the IPL for purely commercial reasons, to have 2 slots of 2.5 minutes each for ads, in addition to the 1 minute slots at the end of each over. As to why it is called "strategic", both teams have been given a slot of a few others (5-10 and 11-15 i think) when they can ask for a timeout at the end of any over. This can he done by a team if it feels that it needs a break to re-think in case the opposition is running away with the game. But since captains do all the strategizing at the end of every over anyway, no one uses the timeouts for any strategic purpose. Apart from the advertisers and BCCI, that is.

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

Cricinfo turns 20

I came to know today that Cricinfo has just turned 20. While reading some of the articles, I realized that I too have completed a decade of following Cricinfo. As a huge cricket fan since childhood, Cricinfo has been my daily companion for the last 10 years. While I do not recall the very 1st time I visited the site, I do remember that I regularly started visiting Cricinfo in 2003, when I entered B-school. Getting access to a broadband network for the 1st time in my life, I began checking scores and reading articles on a daily basis in my Hostel room. I still remember the day when I followed Brian Lara's march towards 400, and "multi-casted" the event on our internal messaging software to the entire Hostel. We would even go to the extent of opening the site on the desktops in our classrooms used by our Professors to share their presentations, and project the ball by ball commentary on the projector, so that cricket crazy students like me could check the score while we waited for the Prof. to enter. I remember how, as a Class Representative, it was my duty to close the window as soon as a Prof. entered our classroom. One one occasion, I mistakenly minimized the window instead of closing it. In those days, when a batsman was dismissed for Zero, Cricinfo used to make a duck walk across the screen. This happened even if the browser window was minimized. And as you would expect, soon after a Prof. started teaching, a duck appeared nonchalantly walking across the projector behind him. Thankfully for me, he did not notice the collective chuckles of the students and turn around to see what was being projected on the wall behind him.

Just like we sometimes get nostalgic about our lives before the internet and mobile phones, I am thinking back to the days before Cricinfo. In those days, I used to religiously subscribe to magazines like Cricket Samrat and Sportstar, for my dose of Cricket scores and articles. And I used to note down details of all Sachin's Test 100s in my notebook, for reference. This also gives you some idea about how long Sachin has been playing.

Happy 20th birthday to Cricinfo !

Thursday, May 16, 2013

The Legend of Sir Jadeja


Jokes about Ravinder Jadeja have been doing on the same rounds on lines similar to Rajanikanth Jokes for the last couple of months. A friend of mine, who is not a cricket fan, asked me a few days back what the fuss was all about. After giving him a detailed explanation, I thought of posting it on my blog, for the benefit of other non-cricket-crazy junta.

Ravinder Jadeja has been getting selected for the indian ODI team since 2009 as an "all rounder". Although his bowling is acceptable, his batting has not been good enough. Till recently, he used to keep getting selected without putting in any good performances. Apparently, this was because Dhoni liked "his potential". So much so that Dhoni also got Jadeja into the CSK IPL team.  General cricket fans were frequently frustrated with his non-performance in the side and jokes started being made on him and Dhoni in social media (like the Dhoni proposing Jadeja for Indian President etc. etc.). 

In the 2012-13 season, Jadeja made 2 triple centuries in domestic cricket. Someone making 2 triples in the same season is very uncommon. And that too by a batsman who does not look like a good player. This was analogues to Irfan Pathan or Harbhajan Singh making 2 triple hundreds, when none of the great indian batsman of the past have not done so. Part of the reason was the extreme flat nature of the wickets he played on for his side Saurashtra.

Then he got selected in the Australia Test matches, again against popular wisdom. Making runs in flat wickets against poor bowling in domestic cricket is one thing. Test cricket is another thing. Though his batting was poor in Tests, he surprised people by bowled very well (on tailor made pitches for spinners, it must be said) .

After that, people started making Jadeja jokes on the same lines as Chuck Norris and Rajanikanth. His CSK team mates like Dhoni and Raina also joined in with some tweets about his "super-natural" powers, calling him Sir Jadeja.

And the "last straw", was this.

Needing 2 runs to win of the last ball. Jadeja was caught on third-man. But the umpire called a no-ball. And they won the match. Now people have a real example of Jadeja's "super-powers" :-) He won them a match inspite of getting out on the last ball.

The legend of Jadeja is growing !!

Monday, April 29, 2013

Raipur Cricket Stadium

One good side effect of Indian Cricket becoming super rich due to IPL and other money spinning endeavors of BCCI is the money being spent on making new stadiums and renovating old ones. The renovation before the 2011 World Cup has completely transformed many of the great cricket venues in India. Wankhede is a completely new stadium now, built from scratch. The new stands in M.A. Chidambaram stadium look beautiful, and provide much better ventilation than before, from the stifling heat in Chennai; the solitary old stand remaining is still an eyesore though. The Eden Gardens renovation might have improved the spectator facilities, but does not seem to have helped improve the aesthetics or atmosphere in the stadium. The decrease in capacity from 90,000 to 55,000 is a big letdown.

The various new stadiums that have been made in tier 2 cities of the country like Nagpur, Pune, Indore, Ranchi etc. are taking top level cricket to these cities on a more regular basis. One hopes that this will also help in improving the associated infrastructure like roads, airports etc. The latest addition to this list is the new stadium in Raipur, that hosted its 1st IPL game on Sunday. I was glued to the telecast to see how it pitted against the other new stadiums in India. From what I heard in the commentary, it seems to be a good one. I am hoping to hear some in-person feedback from friends who attended the match in the stadium soon. Meanwhile, here is an aerial snap that I captured during the telecast.


Saturday, March 26, 2011

Best Siddhuisms from the World Cup

Beware of the naked man who promises you his shirt.


Stop calling the world dirty and first clean your spectacles.


Great minds have purpose, others have wishes.


You ask the same question to 10 people in India, you will get 20 opinions.


A hair and a hair can make a mare's head go bare.

Best of the lot - Democracy is like a barber's chair. It fits everyone's bottom.

Most humorous -
Siddhu - A pessimist burns his bridges before they are built
Harsha's reply - And an optimist dreams of a bridge and thinks it is there.


P.S. - Here are some old gems from the verbenator.

Saturday, February 05, 2011

Best "Yes Minister" Episodes

I first saw the Yes Minister series as a child. Although one would imagine that the mature satire of this famous series would be beyond comprehension of a young kid, I was somehow hooked to it completely. Perhaps it was the influence of my dad who loved the show as it reflected the frustrations he had endured by being a part of the Indian bureaucratic system all his life, that drew me to the series. I simply loved the fabulous interplay between the Minister James Hacker and his Permanent Secretary Sir Humphrey Appleby, the amazingly convoluted ways in which the characters uttered the simplest of phrases and the brutal satire on the state of the civil service and politics.

Over the last few days, I have had the opportunity to catch all episodes of this epic series again on YouTube. Although each and every episode is stuff of sheer genius, here is my list of 5 favorite Yes Minister / Yes Prime Minister episodes (Not in any particular order).
  1. "The Death List" (on YouTube - Part 1, Part 2, Part 3)
  2. "The Skeleton in the Cupboard" (on YouTube - Part 1, Part 2, Part 3)
  3. "Party Games" (on Tudou)
  4. "The Key" (on YouTube - Part 1, Part 2, Part 3)
  5. "The Tangled Web" (on YouTube - Part 1, Part 2, Part 3)
And here are the episode ratings given on IMDB.

Readers are requested to share their favorite episodes as comments.

Monday, January 17, 2011

Chronicals of a chronic cricket fan.. Part III..

6th December 1991 -
I young kid was glued to the TV set, watching cricket being telecast live from the land of Oz for the 1st time on Door Darshan. India were playing the West Indies in Perth. India batted first, and as used to be the case very often in those days, failed to cope with a fast wicket, and were blown over for 126 only. But our bowlers soon staged a comeback, reducing the Windies to 76 for 8, and then 113 for 9. And then Anderson Cummins and Partick Patterson began their last wicket stand. Slowly but surely the chipped away at the runs. By the end of the 40th over, scores were level. Mohd Azharuddin, the captain had bowled out all his four regular bowlers by then, and had to resort to Sachin Tendulkar. The young kid who had seen the last 2 wickets for West Indies add 50 runs and frustrate all Indian bowlers, had finally had enough. "Now we have even run out of main stream bowlers. They are surely going to score the 1 run needed and win." He thought to himself and switched off the TV.

Later that night, when he switched on the TV for his dose of Door Darshan Samachar, he got the shock of his life when he heard that Sachin had taken the last wicket and the match ended in a tie !!

15th January 2011 -
A young professional was watching a live steaming telecast of an match between India and South Africa being played in Johannesburg, on his laptop. India batted first and were blown over for 190. South Africa began the chase well, but faltered in the 2nd half of their innings. Indian bowlers reduced them to 177 for 8. But then Wayne Parnell and Morne Morkel took South Africa to within 2 runs of victory. Given that Harbhajan Singh had bowled out, and Zaheer Khan had just finished an over from the other end, skipper MS Dhoni opted for the ever lethargic Munaf Patel to bowl. The professional had had it by now. Munaf Patel's fitness levels reminded him of cricketers of 70's that he had seen on achieve footage on Youtube. "All hope is lost." He thought to himself, closed the window and decided to do something else.

When he checked the Cricinfo commentary and score 5 minutes later, he saw that lazy bones Munaf had had Santa Clause visiting him 3 weeks late and gifted him 2 wickets of wide long hops (video), and ensuring that India had won by one run !!

P.S. - Here are Part I and Part II.

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Business Class

A friend of mine asked me to to comment on this blog post. During the course of jotting down an elaborate comment, I realized that I had enough material to create a post of my own. So here are a collection of miscellaneous thoughts that I have on managerial qualities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
I have been watching the Star Trek series in my free time off late. I started with The Original Series (with Captain Kirk) and am currently seeing The Next Generation (with Captain Picard).

The 2 captains in TOS and TNG are a study in contrast. While Kirk was a person who lead from the front and micro managed everything, Picard is a master delegator who delegates all secondary tasks to competent personnel and only acts as the face of the Enterprise to the external world. Kirk was an arrogant person who pushed his subordinates to shot for impossible targets. He would even go to the extent of being rude in order to get the work done. He on more than one occasion disobeyed orders from his seniors. But Picard is more well behaved and trusts the ability and opinion of his subordinates. He is also more obedient towards orders from Star Fleet, even if he does not agree with them. But at the end of the day, both of them get the job done efficiently, and save the day for everyone. I am sure all of us have met managers in real life who are similar to Kirk and Picard.  

I have noticed some differences between Indian and American managers during my experience of working with them, which can be linked to the difference in social behavior between Indians and Americans in general. Indians tend to be more overt in exhibiting the following things than Americans (The Americans have these tendencies too, but due to the culture of the country, such things are not very overtly obvious.)
- Ego due to one's position
- Treatment of sub-ordinates with less respect
- Lack of appreciation of other peoples ability, ideas, interests and personal space

Some of the best managers that I have seen are ones that are able to maintain friendly relations with their subordinates (as opposed to bossy) as well as keep enough distant from them so that the subordinates do not take liberties. The key point here is that the connection needs to be genuine and not superficial. Many managers appear to be quite nice and friendly with the sub-ordinates at a superficial level, but actually use the "glib talking" to lure them into things they want them to do. These people are the most dangerous. I would rather have my manager convey the expectations from me in plain language, than coax me into a corner by giving some Gyan.

At the same time, one needs to understand that the job of a manager is not very easy. The resources at disposal (promotion slots, onsite opportunities, budget, timelines) are always limited. And the demands of clients and sub-ordinates are always higher. So most managers do not have any option but to "lie" their way out of sticky situations, making promises that they know they are not going to fulfill. Even Yudhisthira had to resort to an un-truth in the Mahabharat. But as a subordinate, would much rather prefer someone who is objective and honest, rather than someone who is not.

Thursday, December 30, 2010

Beating Mr. Murphy

Warning – ill-logical post ahead.
------------------------------------------------------
If there is one law in the universe that is understood and endured by all, it is the Murphy’s Law. It states that "Anything that can go wrong; will go wrong". Another interpretation of the Law is that “If you expect something to happen, it never will. If you don’t, it definitely will”. For example, if you carry an umbrella with you, it will not rain. If you don’t, it definitely will rain. The internet connection at your home will work perfectly all year, but get screwed up on the day you are working from home. If you are late in reaching office on a single day in the entire year, you will find our boss looking for you at your desk when you arrive. This will not happen on any other day when you are on time.


Every human being is often frustrated by Murphy’s Law. I am no exception. In fact, I have fallen prey to Murphy’s Law so often that I now expect it to strike anytime.  I try to anticipate various eventualities and build contingencies where ever possible. Here are a couple of examples. 
If I have 2 pieces of paper in my pocket, one that has a phone number I am looking for, and another that does not, the mathematical probability of me picking the correct slip of paper from the pocket is 50%. But it is funny how I would almost always pick up the wrong piece of paper from my pocket first. In order to overcome this, I at times pick one piece of paper, drop it, and get the other piece out of my picket. This example applies to many scenarios in real life. 
Another example. I am sure that the day I am low on charge in my cell, I would get an important call while on the road. So, I try to keep a charger handy at all times. But you can never outsmart Mr. Murphy completely. There can always be a day when the charge would be low AND there would be no electricity for me to re-charge AND I would get an urgent call at the same time.


On giving some more thought, I have figured that there are other ways of beating Mr. Murphy. One can use two occurrences of the law to cancel each other out. Here is an example. One of the most general examples of Murphy’s Law is that “If you plan for something, it will not happen. If you don’t, it will”. If you intend to go on a holiday on a specific time of the year and have made bookings and reservations well in advance in order to avoid a last minute rush, Murphy’s Law would indicate that something urgent would come up at the last moment and you would have to cancel the holiday plans. This is one occurrence of Murphy’s Law. This can be countered by applying another occurrence of Murphy’s Law on top of it. If you don’t make any advance arrangements, you will be able to go to the holiday and have to rush like hell at the last minute. Putting both the occurrences together, a way of beating Mr. Murphy emerges. If you really want to go for a holiday, do not make any arrangements in advance. If you do, Mr. Murphy will ensure that you cannot go. If you don’t, Mr. Murphy will ensure that you do go. You will have to endure the pain of making all arrangements at the 11th hour, but at least your bigger objective of going on a holiday would be satisfied.


While on the topic of Murphy’s Laws, another anecdote comes to my mind. A couple of years back, I was involved with projects related to the entertainment industry and was working with various Hollywood studios. In the beginning of the year, I travelled to Los Angeles for a short business trip. On a weekend, I decided to visit one of the famous theme parks. I came to know that my paying a few extra bucks, I could buy an annual pass to the theme park instead of a single day pass. It made sense to me since it was difficult to see all major attractions in a single day. And as I was working for projects in the entertainment industry, I expected to come back to Los Angeles soon for some other project. Hence I guessed that I would always have the opportunity to use the pass again.


By now you would have already guessed what happened next. Mr. Murphy struck. My next project ended up being in the publishing industry and I landed up on the east coast of US. Hence Mr. Murphy had all but ensured that the annual pass was wasted. But this time I was determined to not let Mr. Murphy get the better of me. I went back to the west coast before the year ended, visited the theme park again, and made sure that I utilized my annual pass and saw all the attractions that I missed the first time.

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

My Digicams

July 2006 - December 2010
Sony Cybershot DSC T5


December 2010 - Present

Monday, December 13, 2010

Decoding the Geeta - Part 2

Caution :– Long post ahead
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Continued from here.

Link between spirituality and science
As I have expressed before, concepts of religion and spirituality were created by great thinkers at various stages of human history in order to show man the right way of living life. While some aspects of various streams of religious thought are in the realm of fiction, used to force man to follow the right path based on a feeling of fear of divine beings, some other aspects do have parallels in science. It was perhaps the very limited development of science at the time that these ideas were first propagated, that resulted in them being represented in the realm of religion and spirituality than the realm of science, for the sake of a common man’s acceptance. For example, the fact that the “tulsi” plant has renowned medicinal properties perhaps resulted in it being designated the status of a holy plant. The various benefits obtained from a cow (as a source of transport, resource for ploughing fields, source of milk, manure and energy) resulted in it being designated a divine animal. According to Hindu cosmology, the entire universe is created and destroyed in one day of Brahma’s life. The next day in his life heralds the creation of a new universe. One full day (1 kalpas) in Brahma’s life consists of 8.64 billion years. Modern science estimates the age of the universe as being about 13.75 billion years. The fact that ancient astronomers got the order of magnitude of the biggest calculation in the world right, indicates the maturity their scientific awareness, and also shows how they used religion to convey scientific truths.

Now that we live in an age of science, where blind belief in religious and spiritual thought is not considered rational by many, perhaps linking scientific truths to spirituality will help a modern man understand it better. Unfortunately, most literature of the day on the Geeta has been authored by religious gurus, who have not moved on with the times in terms of explaining the purport in a language of the modern scientifically thinking rational man. If efforts in made in this area, today’s generation can view the great poem in a completely new light and appreciate it. Who knows, they may even be able to inculcate some of the teachings in their lives.

As an engineer, I have often tried to find parallels between spiritual and scientific thought. One of the greatest theories in Hindu spiritual thought is the concept of “aatman” (soul). As elucidated in the Geeta, “aatman” is un-damageable and indestructible, whereas the body is not. And the aatman keeps going through infinite cycles of taking various bodily forms. Although this idea seems to be in the realm of fiction to most people, I believe I have a theory for linking the concept of “aatman” explained in the Geeta to parallels in science.

Literal meaning of relevant shkolas from the Geeta
1.
na jayate mriyate va kadacit
nayam bhutva bhavita va na bhuyah
ajo nityah sasvato 'yam purano
na hanyate hanyamane sarire

Breaking it word by word -
na -- never; jayate -- takes birth; mriyate -- dies; va -- either; kadacit -- at any time (past, present or future);
na -- never; ayam -- this; bhutva -- having come into being; bhavita -- will come to be; va -- or; na -- not; bhuyah -- or is again coming to be;
ajah -- unborn; nityah -- eternal; sasvatah -- permanent; ayam -- this; puranah -- the oldest;
na -- never; hanyate -- is killed; hanyamane -- being killed; sarire -- the body.

Literal Translation
For the soul there is neither birth nor death at any time. The soul has not come into being, does not come into being, and will not come into being. The soul is unborn, eternal, ever-existing and primeval. It is not slain when the body is slain.

2.
Vasamsi Jeernani Yatha Vihaya Navani Grihanani Naroparani
Tatha Sharirani Vihaya Jeernani Aniani Samyathi Navani Dehee

Breaking it word by word -
Vasamsi- Clothes, Jeernani- worn out, Vatha- as, Vihaya- Casting off, Navani- now, Grihanani- takes, Narah- A man,
Tatha- so, Sharirani- bodies, Aniani- others, Samyathi- enters.

Literal Translation
As a man casts off his worn out clothes and adorns new ones, so does the soul casts off worn out bodies and enters into other which are new.

3.
Avyaktadini bhutani
Vyakta-madhyani bharata
Avyakta-nidhanany eva
Tatra ka paridevana

Breaking it word by word -
avyakta-adini--in the beginning unmanifested; bhutani--all that are created;
vyakta--manifested; madhyani--in the middle; bharata--O descendant of Bharata;
avyakta—non manifested; nidhanani--all that are vanquished; eva--it is all like that;
tatra--therefore; ka--what; paridevana--lamentation.

Literal Translation
O descendent of Bharata, all beings start without a physical body and at death they are again without a body. Only in between do they have a physical body, so why lament?

4.
na tv evāhaḿ jātu nāsaḿ
na tvaḿ neme janādhipāḥ
na caiva na bhaviṣyāmaḥ
sarve vayam ataḥ param

Breaking it word by word –
na — never; tu — but; eva — certainly; aham — I; jātu — at any time; na — did not; āsam — exist;
na — not; tvam — you; na — not; ime — all these; jana-adhipāḥ — kings;
na — never; ca — also; eva — certainly; na — not; bhaviṣyāmaḥ — shall exist;
sarve vayam — all of us; ataḥ param — hereafter.

Literal translation
Never was there a time when I did not exist, nor you, nor all these kings; nor in the future shall any of us cease to be.

Explanation given by religious gurus -
The core principle elucidated in these shlokas is the fact that the soul is eternal entity that has no beginning or end. Neither does it have any shape or form. The soul passes from one body to another limitless number of times. The soul enters a living being’s body at the time of his birth and exits at the time of his death. Subsequently, it may enter another living being’s body. A living being can be any animal or plant. No person in the world knows the living being that his soul had inhabited previously or will inhabit in the future. The body is just like a dress that the soul wears which can be thrown away after a while and be replaced by a new one. Hence one should not lament the loss (death) of a bodily form, as the soul has not died with it.
Krishna tells Arjuna that there was never a time in the universe when Arjuna, Krishna or any of the kings fighting the battle did not exist in the past. And there will never be a time when they will cease to exist in the future. But Arjuna or anyone else will never know the various forms in which they exist.

Possible scientific parallels –
Everything in this universe is made up of atoms and molecules. This includes the living and the non-living. A man is born from the atoms of his mother. The food and nutrition that help him grow and become an adult consist of atoms. When a man dies, the atoms that make up his body get dissipated in nature. They transform into other natural elements and mix with soil, water or air. These atoms may then follow an infinite number of routes to the body of another living being. An atom mixed in soil may become a part of a seed of a plant, an atom mixed with water may be ingested by an animal, inhibit its body and then move to its offspring. The possibilities are endless. Some atoms may spend an extended period of time in a non-living form (in metal, rock, air etc.) before moving into living being’s body.

The atoms that all of us are made up of are nothing but our soul. They come together into a finite form (“dress”) that we call our bodies. They will depart from our bodies after our death and merge with some other part of nature. And this cycle with infinite number of combinations is each stage is repeated infinite times. None of us know where the atoms that we are made of come from, which living or non-living entity did they inhabit earlier, or what they will transform into after our deaths. Hence an enlightened person should not mourn the loss of a bodily form, as the constituent elements will never be lost. The atoms that all of us consist of are in a sense eternal and cannot be destroyed.

Conclusion –
This example shows how intelligently the writer(s) of the Geeta may have molded a scientific truth into a spiritual concept in order to show man the right path. They used the fact that all things in the universe consist of the same constituent elements (atoms) that go through infinite cycles of transformation to impress upon man the idea of "aasakti" from the physical body. The concept of the “aatman” was been used to motivate people to "give their best" to anything which they do without actually attaching a very material significance to their actions.

Readers are welcome to leave their thoughts as comments. 

References -
1.     Mahabharat Episodes with the Geeta (Must watch) –
a.     Episode 72 
  1. Bhaktivedanta VedaBase: Bhagavad-gita As It Is 2.20
  2. A to Z Calender 
  3. Chapter 2. Contents of the Gita Summarized
  4. Srimad Bhagavad Gita 
  5. Bhaktivedanta VedaBase: Bhagavad-gītā As It Is 2.12
  6. Wiki link for Age of the Universe
  7. Wiki link for a Day in the Life of Brahma
  8. Carl Sagan on links of Hindu Mythology with modern astronomy

Tuesday, October 26, 2010

Decoding the Geeta - Part 1

Caution:- Long post ahead.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As a great fan of Mahabharat, and a student of the principles of life outlined in the Geeta, I have constantly tried to unearth the real meaning behind some of the convoluted shlokas that make up this epic poem. But unlike most others who read the translations and subsequent elaboration provided by most books on The Geeta, I preferred approach is to de-construct each original Sanskrit word myself and arrive at my own interpretation of the subject matter. I prefer this in order to avoid biasing my personal understanding of the lines by interpretations of others. I guess this approach is similar to understanding the results of a chemical reaction by actually performing an experiment in the lab, as against just reading about it in a textbook and assuming it to be correct.

In this post, I will try to deconstruct the most famous lines in The Geeta and present my understanding. These lines provide the proverbial “saar” of the Geeta. Almost everything else said in the Geeta can be linked to these lines in some way or the other. Please feel free to post comments and share your thoughts.

karmaṇy evādhikāras te
mā phaleṣu kadācana
mā karma-phala-hetur bhūr
mā te sańgo 'stv akarmaṇi

Let us start by breaking up the above lines into each individual word. (Sanskrit is a language of sandhi (joint words). In order to decipher the meaning of any shlokha, one needs to separately identify each and every word, and then put the meaning back together).

karmaṇi — in prescribed duties;
eva — certainly;
adhikāraḥ — right;
te — of you;

mā — never;
phaleṣu — in the fruits;
kadācana — at any time;

Constructed meaning – You have the right to your duty; never to its fruits.

mā — never;
karma-phala — in the result of the work;
hetuḥ — cause;
bhūḥ — become;

mā — never;
te — of you;
sańgaḥ — attachment;
astu — there should be;
akarmaṇi — in not doing prescribed duties.

Constructed meaning – Do not consider yourself to be the result of your actions; never be attached to not doing your duty.

Now that the literal meaning is out of the way, let us try to put together the purport –

You have the right to doing your duties, but not the result. While what you need to do is in your control, the result of your actions is not.

Never consider what is happening to you as the cause of the results of your actions. But at the same time, do not get detached from performing your duty.

Now for the understanding –

The most common comment people have on this shloka is – 
“How can I motivate myself without being attached to the results?” 
Having wrestled with this question myself for long, I am presenting my understanding of the teaching below.

One of the most important words in the above shloka is “adhikarah”, i.e. right. A person’s rights are limited to what he can do, i.e. this actions, not the result thereof. If one does not have the right to something, one cannot demand it. For example, one person does not have the right to another person’s wealth, hence he cannot demand it. If something is beyond ones rights, achieving it or not is a matter of fate, i.e. something beyond one’s control. If something is out of one’s control, getting attached to it is meaningless.

The Geeta aims to direct humanity towards this higher level of consciousness, which can be a bit difficult to grasp for ordinary people like us. Here is an example for illustrate this. I am sure all of us can remember our childhoods when we used to get emotionally attached to petty objects. A child brings down the house if his toy is broken. His parents try to console him by trying to convince him not to get too emotionally attached to the toy. The toy is not all that important in his life, they tell him. But the child does not understand his parent’s reasoning. For him, the loss of the toy is the biggest disappointment of his life. It is only after the child becomes an adult (and rises to a higher level of consciousness) that he realizes how silly his thinking process was as a child. The toy was actually an immaterial entity. Losing it was not such a big deal. It did not make any difference to his life in the long term.

Extending the same logic, ordinary humans like us are like “children”, who are attached to “toys” like wealth, rank, family etc. We feel inconsolably distraught on loosing these “toys”. But a truly enlightened person would treat these “toys” with the same disregard as an adult treats children’s toys. In the larger picture, all these things do not matter.

karmaṇy evādhikāras te
mā phaleṣu kadācana

“If I am not attached to something, how will I strive for it? If I am not attached to money, how will I convince myself to earn it? If I do not earn, how will I support my family?”

It is here that the concept of “kartavya” (duty) comes in.  It is a man’s duty to perform the right actions. A person’s rights are limited to his actions, i.e. his duties, and not to its results. So at no point should he get attached to the results of those actions. The results of the actions should not govern the tenacity with which he performs his duty. He should perform his duty not because he will get something in return, but because it is the right thing to do. For example, if you are walking on the road, and you see an old man stumble and fall in front of you, you would naturally help him stand up on his feet again. You do this not because you want anything in return, but because it is the right thing to do. The same applies to all facets of life. It is every man’s duty to pursue excellence; earn enough to support his family; provide good education to his children; help the poor and needy. But an ideal man should perform these duties without being attached to their results. This is the concept of “nishkaam karm” (duty without want).

An ordinary person finds it almost impossible to give up attachment to temporal things, and strive towards “nishkaam karm”. But an enlightened person raises himself above “moh maya”. He does not need the carrot of the result to be motivated to perform his actions. He performs his actions because that is the right thing to do, i.e. his duty.

A student should study hard for an exam, and put his heart and soul into understanding the subject and scoring well. But he should do it because that is the right thing to do, i.e. his duty, without being attached to the “moh” (want) of securing a high rank in class. The rank in class is not in his control (not his right or “adhikaar”), and is the result of many other factors like other students’ performances etc.

A professional should strive towards excellence in his profession, because that is his duty and not because of his attachment to a high position or greater wealth. That is out of his control.

The results of one’s actions are not based on his actions only. Hence attaching oneself to it is meaningless.

mā karma-phala-hetur bhūr

The cause of all sorrow in the world is attachment to results. Detachment from results is the only true way in which a person can deal with the ups and downs of life effectively. A person who can detach himself from the results of his actions is called “sthita-pragya” (sthita- seated, pragya- wisdom, i.e seated in wisdom). He does not get moved from his mental center of gravity either in joy or sorrow. Detachment from results can help you tide over any sorrow, overcome feelings of anger and jealousy and maintain your equilibrium in moments of joy. In fact, one can argue that a “sthita-pragya” is in a perennial state of joy, as inner joy can only come from performing one’s duties correctly, and nothing else. As long as you have performed all your duties, you should be happy. The results of your duties should not make you happy or sad.

A key point to note here is that “detachment” does not mean “indifference”. Detachment does not mean not loving your family, not caring for the needy, not striving for a good living. A person should do all these as they are his duties, but without being expecting anything in return, or being attached to the result. Do not be detached from your duty, be detached from the results.

Giving love to others is your duty, but receiving love from others in return (the result) is not in your control. Do not expect love in return. It is the duty of your loved ones to reciprocate your love, which they should perfom.

Helping the needy is your duty, but whether the person you have helped would be grateful to you or not, is out of your control. Being grateful is the other person’s duty, which he should perform.

In this way, if every person in the world performs his duty, all discord can be done away with.

At the same time, not doing your duty is a sin. Another practical example can illustrate this point better. If you have an ailing mother, it is your duty to ensure that you do everything in your capability to help her recover. If you cannot save her in spite of your best efforts, do not loose your balance in sorrow. However, if her demise was the result of a lack of effort from your side in taking care of her, you have not performed your duty. This is where the concept of “prayashchit” (redemption) comes in. You are then required to repent and redeem yourself in various ways.

mā te sańgo 'stv akarmaṇi

Most of us (including the writer) may never reach the state of such enlightenment in our lives. But that is what we should all strive for.


Part 2 is here.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Footnote:- I would like to clarify that I am not a “Krishna Bhakt” or a Geeta preacher, but merely a student of Hindu spiritual thought. The content of this post should be regarded as a dispassionate analysis and not a religious discourse. Readers are requested to share their thoughts on as comments. Please feel free to agree or disagree with me. A constructive discussion will only refine the analysis.

References -
  1. http://vedabase.net/bg/2/47/
  2. http://krishnabhakt.blogspot.com/2008/07/karmanye-vadhikaraste.html
  3. Mahabharat Episodes with the Geeta (Must watch) –
    1. Episode 72 
    2. Episode 73 
    3. Episode 74 

Monday, October 11, 2010

The burden of greatness

The entire country is currently going gaga over Sachin Tendulkar reaching the  milestone of 14,000 Test runs days after being awarded the ICC Cricketer of the Year Award at the ripe old age of 37. His form over the last 2 years has been nothing short of phenomenal and experts are bewildered by how even after two decades in the game can a man churn out runs from his bat with such enormity.

In a speech soon after he retired, Anil Kumble spoke about the difference between himself and Sachin Tendulkar. He said something along the following lines - Both Sachin and I made our debuts for India around the same time, 1989 and 1990 respectively. When Sachin appeared on the cricket scene, everyone know that an all time great was in the making. And when I started, everyone doubted my ability and thought I would not last long in international cricket. I have spent all my life proving people wrong, and Sachin has spent all his life proving people right.

The last line from Kumble reflects the burden on the man. Sahin Tendulkar has to prove to the world that he is truly the all time great that the world has expected him to be ever since his early days. In order to do that, he must reach heights that no other batsman has reached, or will reach in the future. I remember an interview which Sunil Gavaskar did with a young Sachin in the early 90's, where he said that Sachin MUST make 40 hundreds and score 15,000 runs in Test cricket before he retires. Sachin has long surpassed the 40 hundreds mark (48 and counting as of now), and is probably shooting for the 15,000 mark before he hangs up his boots. If he manages to reach the milestones of 50 hundreds and 15,000 runs in Test Cricket along with the 17,000+ runs and 46 hundreds (hopefully 50 by the time he stops) he has scored in ODIs, he would surely have set a mark that no other batsman will ever reach, much like Muralidharan's 800 Test wickets. With the T20 revolution sweeping the world, one can foresee the amount of Test and ODI cricket reduce in the future. This along with the fact that the batsmen of the future who will be brought up on the diet of T20 cricket, are less likely to have the technique and temperament to play long innings in Tests, will ensure that Tendulkar's records are never overtaken. Lara has the only 400 in Tests. Sachin knows that his 37 year old body will not allow him play an inning long enough to beat that mark (In the recent past, we have seen him cramp up whenever he plays a longish inning). But he has the 1st 200 in ODIs as an answer.

Back in 2007, many people thought that Tendulkar had played his last World Cup. There was no way he could last till the 2011 version. But as with all great men, the burden of greatness at times forces them to shoot for targets no one would try under normal circumstances. The ODI World Cup is one such target for Sachin. The greatest batsman in the modern generation does not want to retire without a world title under his belt. Hence, ever since 2007, Sachin's has played cricket with the single minded focus with being available for the 2011 World Cup. He knows that his body can no longer sustain the grind of non-stop cricket all round the year. Hence he takes calculated breaks from ODIs in order to let his body recoup. And his unbelievable run making streak over the last 2 years can also be attributed to the fact that he knows within that his cricketing days are nearing their end. Hence he wants to make the most of the final phase of his career, and go out on a high.

India's rise to the Number 1 position in Test rankings will also give Sachin great satisfaction. His aim would be to take India to the ODI World Cup title in 2011, after which he can retire with the satisfaction of taking his country to the top in both formats of the game. Bowing out of the game after a World Cup win will be the ultimate swan song for the legend. I have a firm belief that if India do go on to win the World Cup next year, Sachin will retire from all cricket right then. Even if India don't win, Sachin will definitely retire from ODIs. He may or may not play Test cricket for some more time.

In the recent past, there has been a trend for cricketers announcing their retirements beforehand and playing a farewell series in front of adoring fans. Saurav Ganguly, Shane Warne, Glenn McGarth, Steve Waugh have all done it. It would be fitting if Sahin too does the same. But I have a strong feeling that he would not. Any retirement announcement from him before a Test series will invariably result in a media and fan frenzy unseen in the history of the game. The outpouring of emotions from fans and the resultant media circus is bound to be so huge that it would undermine the team's focus from the cricket, and possibly Sachin's focus on his final few innings. And being the reserved person that he is, I am sure Sachin would not want that to happen. Hence, I am sure Sachin's retirement announcement will come as a bolt from the blue for his fans, after the conclusion of a series or tournament. I am also sure that he has decided the time when he would retire internally, but has kept it to himself or his close confidants, in order to avoid a media frenzy.

The millions of cricket fans of Sachin all over the world should cherish each inning that he plays these days, since these are the last few times they will ever get to see the great man bat.

Update (6th Jan 2011) -
When Tendulkar finished batting in the Cape Town Test against South Africa, he did something unusual while walking off the ground. He looked skywards. As all of his fans already know, Sachin follows the ritual of looking skywards and thanking the heavens after reaching major landmarks like 100s and 200s. But it was unusual to see him doing this when he is walking of the ground at the end of a Test match when his score was only 14 not out. This act was even picked up by the Cricinfo commentary.
The players shake hands with each other. Alviro has a chat with Tendulkar, who then has a look at the sun and walks away. 
Could this be an indication of something very significant? Could this indicate that Sachin has played his last test inning and intends to retire at the end of the World Cup of 2011? Here is the video of the event. Check 6.17.

Wednesday, October 06, 2010

Chronicals of a chronic cricket fan.. Part II..

14th Dec 1994 -
The 1st ever Test match in Mohali. India playing West Indies. At the end of the previous day's play (day 4 of the Test match), India were 37 for 1 in the 4th innings, with Sachin Tendulkar unbeaten on 6. India needed another 321 runs to win on the final day. Given the good pitch with decent pace and bounce that had not deteriorated over the 1st 4 days of the Test like a typical Indian wicket, the young (and naive) cricket fan within me was hopeful of a fantastic run-chase on the final day, spearheaded by Tendulkar, who had hit a big hundred in the previous Test at Nagpur.
So I switched on the TV set early in the morning with great expectations, looking forward to be glued to the TV set all day. But I had not accounted for the fact that this was the Indian team of the 90's, which used to flatter and deceive it's fans more often than not. Sachin was dismissed within the 1st 10 minutes of play. And India were bowled out for 114 by lunchtime. The 1st step in the making of a perennially pessimistic cricket fan had been taken.

5th Oct 2010 -
Another Test match at Mohali. India vs. Australia. Another similar situation at the end of day 4. India 55 for 4 in the 4th innings, chasing 216 for victory. The wicket this time was a typically Indian, crumbling at the end of day 4. Sachin Tendulkar at the crease again, unbeaten on 10. Could the God of Cricket undo the failings of 1994? I was not too sure. I was out of the country, in a time zone 10 hours behind. I was wondering if I should sacrifice the night's sleep to watch the finale. I ran the risk of spoiling my sleep as well as my mood (if India lost). Memories of 14th Dec 1994 were still fresh in my mind. But the optimist in me somehow won that day. To hell with sleep, I said to myself. Sachin might retire after World Cup 2011. This might be one of his last hurrays. I will never forgive myself if I miss it. I tuned in online.
Day 5 begins to follow the similar script as 16 years ago. Sachin is dismissed within the 1st hour, India crumble to 124 for 8. It was 14th Dec 1994 all over again. But I do not realize two important differences. The opposition is Australia and the batsman at the crease is VVS Laxman. And whenever these two things happen together, fans are always in for something Very Very Special. Laxman adds 80 runs with Ishant Sharma, followed by 11 with Pragyan Ojha to take India to it's 1st ever 1 wicket victory in Tests. History is NOT repeated at Mohali.

Part I is here.

Saturday, August 21, 2010

The Future of Laptops

As many tech-gurus had foreseen, the launch of the iPad has resulted in an upheaval in the personal computing world. Steve Jobs has hit the bullseye for the 3rd time in a row. iPod, iPhone and now the iPad. He has changed the landscape of the industry for the 3rd time within a decade. Just like the iPod and the iPhone completely changed the way electronics manufacturers looked at portable music players and phones, the iPad has resulted in a mad rush between computer manufactures to come up with a competing tablet PC. I remember a Steve Jobs interview in early 2007, when he had predicted that the future belonged to post-PC devices. We now know what he meant.

The iPad has shown that tablets can be a great medium for content consumption; Games, Movies, Music, Internet. But they are not a very convenient instrument for heavy duty content creation, authoring like documents, creating presentations, editing images etc.. So while the iPad can be a fantastic addition to your personal electronics arsenal, it cannot replace your good old laptop (at least now now).

But if I were a computer manufacturer today, I would be seriously planning for that day. The question I would ask is, in what way is the iPad better that the laptop computer I have been manufacturing over the years? I guess the answer is simple -
1. Touch screen interface
2. Portability and weight
3. Integration with Apple's other typical wizardry like Apps Store, iTunes etc.

Really, that is about it.

While other companies cannot do anything about #3, #1 and #2 are not so difficult.

#1. Touch screen interface is becoming more and more commonplace by the day. Apart from most smartphones, even digicams and handycams have touch screen interfaces these days. I will put my neck on the line and say that the day is not far when all laptops will have touch screen interfaces. It will not take Apple and Android long to create OS versions that support touch screen interfaces for full fledged computing devices like laptops. Microsoft will soon jump into the bandwagon (copying others as they have done for decades) with a Windows variant. I believe that within 5 years or less, most laptops will run touch screen interfaces like the one seen in the iPad or other tablet PCs being launched today. The days of the trackpad are numbered.

#2. This is even simpler. Laptops are getting slimmer and slimmer by the day anyway. More processing power is being backed into lighter and more portable machines all the time. Within 5 years, all the computing power in a top of the line laptop can be compressed into a device of the size of an iPad.

Now for the things that a laptop has that the iPad does not -
1. Full Manual Keyboard
2. Other peripherals like CD/DVD/Blur Ray player, USB, Webcam etc.
3. More computing power

#2 and #3 are no brainers. They can be easily possible going by the same logic as I highlighted in the previous paragraph.

#1 can either be achieved with an add on keyboard (as is already available with the iPad) or a slide out keyboard. Just like slider phones have slide out keyboards, a tablet PC can also be designed to have a slide out keyboard what can be used for full speed typing. This would convert an iPod like tablet into a complete laptop.

Here are a couple of photos from the recently launched Blackberry Torch.


As you can see, RIM has tried to bring the best of both worlds into this phone - a full size "iPhone like" touch screen interface and a full blackberry keyboard.

I believe that laptop manufacturers can easily take a cue from this and come up with a similar design for a laptop in the near future. The 13 or 14 inch laptop screen could be made touch enabled and powered by any touch based OS like Android or a Windows variant. A keyboard could slide out from from behind when required, and be tilted and fixed at an angle to the screen to convert the tablet into a functioning laptop, with all the associated bells and whistles.

Hence, I believe we are not far away from the time when a laptop and tablet PC will cease to be separate categories of devices, but merge into a super-tablet genre. What has happened with portable music players and phones in the recent past will happen to laptops and tablet PCs too.